Sunday, November 20, 2011

PPP - Presentation Post - WK #4


Link to Final Document:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YLb9vcqqeUyogp_UVakVSCdPgoKGIYxBfsDUG-7tBoY/edit



Link to PPP Think-a-Loud #1:

http://mac613.blogspot.com/2011/11/ppp-think-loud-blog-post-1.html

Link to PPP Think-a-Loud #2:

http://mac613.blogspot.com/2011/11/ppp-think-loud-post-2-week-3.html

Since I was unable to present my paper for publication in Wimba this week, I shared my paper with my classmate and my critical friends and this is the feedback I received.  This considerate feedback was beneficial in helping me prepare my paper for publication.

From Rosetta Cash:

"Good introduction and thorough coverage of the literature review. I do think that you can expand and add a bit more information in your methodologies section. Overall, I found your article informative. It provided me with information about Twitter that I did not know. I am not a Twitter user and have avoided becoming a part of the Twitter phenomenon. However, looking at its potential in academia has me rethinking my position."



















From Laura Hammock:



"Aside from the few grammar and typos that we talked about that you need to fix, I think your paper sounds good.  I still think you need to consider adding a Facebook presence for them to drive traffic to their Twitter feed.  I know that you said you are not working with them anymore, but I think that would be an easy suggestion to add to your paper.  Maybe add a sentence stating that in the future a Facebook page could be added to increase their online presence.  All of that being said, you offer a lot of interesting ways to use Twitter."








From Karla Thompson:




 "I enjoyed learning about Twitter and its educational implications.  While I’m familiar with Twitter personally I have not considered its use in the classroom.  I would encourage you to proof your draft for punctuation and capitalization to ensure consistency throughout the document.  There were also some grammatical and mechanical errors that could impede the intended meaning of your paper."

No comments:

Post a Comment